Why is this “the Spirit of Islam”? Why is ‘bullying’ the expression of this Religion across a billion people?
I know you cannot process images, things that you see in front of your face, so I have to tell you in words…. because you can’t see beyond might is right, causing this kid to grow up to pick on other kids, and the cult continues.
So what did the bigger Muslim Boys of Compassion and Peace miss? They believe ‘actions’ affect ‘beings.’ In other words, if you do ‘swim’ you will become a swimmer. Drop them in the deep end. To dominate children is an Islamic thing.
Number 41409 dated 7/5/1421
August 8, 2000
Praise is to God and blessings on the prophet that is the last of all prophets.
The permanent committee for scientific research and religious sanctions has looked onto the request of Abu Abdallah Mohammed Al Shamry which was sent to the committee from the general secretariat of the Committee of Higher Scholars number 1809 date 3/5/1421. The requester asked the following:
Lately, It has spread on a large scale, especially in weddings, the habit of thighing little boys; what is the ruling of the Quran on this? Especially, that God’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) has thighed Ayesha (may God be pleased with her)
The committee, after studying the request, has ruled the following:
It is not the true guidance of Muslims throughout centuries to resort to the use of these unlawful practices, which were imported to our countries through the immoral videos that are being sent by the infidels and enemies of Islam. As for the thighing of the messenger of God to his fiancée Ayesha, she was six years old and he could not engage in sexual intercourse with her because of her young age, therefore he used to place his penis between her thighs and rub it lightly. In addition, the messenger of God had full control of his penis in contrary to the believers. Therefore, it is not permitted to practice thighing, whether in weddings, or at homes, or schools, due to its grave harm. And may God curse the infidels who brought these practices to our countries. “
Because they have no spirit, they think no child has spirit.
The exact opposite is the Socialist.
They believe ‘beings’ affect ‘actions.’ So a child of Communism is selected to be allowed swim if they hold the correct properties of form, and if they don’t – no opportunity for them. Be careful for the Ethnicity/Skin color/Sexual Preference/Genderless/Gender/Religion you ask for. For they will give with one hand and take with the other.
submitting to the Voice of Communism.
Vlad Tepes made a valid point when he said his blogsite would alienate people from coming to read if he poisoned the well with his opinions on other topics. That is, if he believed something someone else disagreed with, they would not value his opinions on Islam, though they may be true. Everyone is at a different level of understanding. There was a time, five years ago, to criticize the Religion of Peace was seen as poor taste, because we knew all religions were worshiping the same God of Love. No one knew at the time what the intent of any Religion was – to consolidate power for the few, to take a philosopher or a narcissist and turn him into a cult for an Elite to manage and barter in memes.
The Socratic dialogues are among the world’s all-time greatest advertising. They are the propaganda or “foundation myth” for Plato’s cult, much as the story about Alexander’s dream of Homer makes up the foundation myth for the City of Alexandria and its museum and great library [recall Lesson 9; also Lesson 11, footnote 4 ]. The dialogues are the scriptures for Plato’s Academy, the school for philosophy that Plato founded in a sacred grove outside of Athens in about 387 BC, some dozen years after the historical Socrates had been executed.
The deep change of personality, through a traumatic emotional experience, is easiest in childhood. There, the credulous child-mind receives the imprint of social values and norms. There, the need for love and validation can be withheld to take a new direction.
What kind of people do this? The jealous and inadequate. They gained a pleasure in corrupting and blinding minds so theirs won’t be seen, to make automatons and slaves out of their opponents. The law of the victim: kill or be killed, ruin or be ruined, dominate or be dominated, fear or be feared.
During the reign of Communists, the collectivized powerless were promised to become powerful, and the West learned of this group-psychological warfare. To dehumanize a person, to relinquish the self, for the glory of The State or for the Glory of God or Nirvana. “There is no greater love than to give up your life for another person” became “there is no greater reward than to die in the service of your Master”. One is a knowing sacrifice while the other is no sacrifice at all, as they had nothing to lose.
This blog looks at the Father, Mother and Child. The Three fakes. Today they are named Islam, Socialism and Sexful, yet they were once were Father, Holy Ghost and Sexless Son: The imagined voice of The Father, the fleeting sound of Mother and the Magnificent Half-ling. Yet how can anyone live and rely upon a fickle Holy Spirit? That fleeting, intermittent signal passed from one to the other in awe and amazement. Why isn’t it always online?
The Communists have the Mother, “Holy Moses”, and Drone Daughter. “Holy Moses!” being the reaction to another crisis to enact yet another a Five Year Plan.
Why can’t we have it all, to be whole? To forgive the Mother and Father, and to love ourselves?
These are the sick we discuss by observation. That we once were. These are the sick who will be set free if they recognize themselves. To hold up a mirror. To face the truth about themselves.
“You can’t love Jesus because you’ve never met him”
This is the truth. You can love the ideas attributed to him, but there is no magic in any learned and memorized piece of writing, no matter how old.
The imprints of a cruel culture by an absence of affection creates a hunger and craving for what they have lost. The absent Mother creates a mommy-sucker on the teat of Socialism and an absent father a daddy-sucker on the teat of Fascism. Trying to get into their shoes for comfort they do not have. Instead of the mother or father being in them, they try to get into the mother or father. They have it ass-backwards.
And one day, it might happen.
A woman and a man become a feminist with the Righteous Judgement of Mother;
a woman and a man become a fascist with the righteous judgement of Father;
a woman and a man become inverted with the nature of identifying with form.
They surrendered and submitted to their ills, instead of facing them, and became a New Creation.
The destruction of society begins again and the next generation suffer at their hands.
“If there is any one secret of success,” said Henry Ford, “it lies in the ability to get the other person’s point of view and see things from his angle as well as from your own” P56 How to win friends and influence people by Dale Carnegie paperback 1977 SBN 437 95006 9
The ability to inform and inspire people into believing
1. they deserve what they can get,
2. to advise on the next fashionable essential,
3. and being relatively painless to attain.
The bottom line is they have to be deceived to trust you. That trust is engineered by you being true on things you can only be true about.
Therefore, flatter, honestly. Show an interest in them, be knowledgeable, don’t expose your intelligence too much and they’ll show an interest in picking you onto their team.
Then you can create anxiety, identify their preferential needs, and then provide them the very means to achieve their comfort. Problem, Reaction, Solution.
Islam is obviously not a religion based on goodness. There is no kindness to the unbeliever. The truth is: it is a Religion of Peace. If you have no right-brain allowed into the culture, and your left-brain is plugged into a scriptures into adoration-worship… this is a peaceful state of mind… of stupefaction… focused upon every word of the Prophet… punctuated by outrage and violence when unplugged. To pleasurably violate women, in destroying their beauty and vision where every covered-up Musselma stating the advantages of being the fourth wife, is ecstasy.
Socialism is obviously not based on fairness. There is no value given to those who create opportunities of wealth out of nothing but hard graft. There is no statement: ‘plenty will be given to those who have plenty,’ only ‘each will be given according to his needs’. The truth is to call it The Religion of Love. If you have no left-brain and your right-brain is plugged into romance… this is perpetual love… focused on a charismatic Dear Leader… the soothsayer of things to come… punctuated by outrage and violence in unplugged. They violate men for a sense of life. To hear male apologists for all bad things men have done is excruciatingly delightful.
Homoeroticism is obviously not a reproductive act. There is no next-generation. It cannot by definition be called sex, because it is only the taking from the external form of another to represent what they once were. A more beautiful boy makes for the sense of being a more beautiful man. The truth is to call it a Religion of The Soul. The ‘see-er’ – that which looks at the left and the right brains – becomes the new New-Identity, the new Id. The New Creation. Black is white and white is black. Outside the realm of Nature, of all creatures, into a new one. An Elite Conscience imprinted by the world. A violation that reprogrammed the very ROM memory of the brain. Their very instincts changed. The innermost succulence of a child for a sense of life they do not have.
These are our customers. Do I want to be friends to influence them? “I like your religion, I like your one-parent families, I like your Gay lifestyle? Or looking for the honest minutia to speak: “your beard and nails look well trimmed; that baby has a nice tee-shirt; my, you have been working out” because you only have to know them until the business transaction is complete, and they’ll remember you as the unassuming nice guy they will trade with again. They felt good. Your techniques worked! You made it so by using the tricks of a real friendship. Just like an actor has to be ‘honest’ when plumbing the depths of their soul to make a role look ‘just right’.
Henry Ford had an abundance of oil, and a captive market to buy his vehicles as long as they were black. When that market wanted to buy elsewhere, he left it for the Japanese to put his finer words into practice. Cars moved from utility vehicles to luxury goods meeting the appetites to find a demonstration of wealth, power, and recognition.
They went to the ‘male’, ‘female’ and the ‘invert’. That is the TV you have. One characteristic is dominant, the others are all stupid. No upsetting counter-intuitive characters appearing to blow the charade up.
Edward Bernays recognized the desire in many women – to be equal to males – could be attracted to what was already marketed as a symbol of masculinity through cigarette smoking, by calling them “Torches of Freedom.” If it had been Men’s Club Memberships as his sales-targets, he would have got women to join them as “Porches of Evedom”. However, pipe-smoking never had a virile male following, and so women were not tempted to walk around with vulva-shaped pipes hanging between gritted teeth.
Objects gains greater value when more monkeys are attracted to them. Those who perceived themselves as beta-animals, the majority, could be coerced to imagine they joined the successful majority by possessing what they had. Governments would go further and steal from the rich to give to the poor and then to limit opportunities of self-advancement.
“White Privilege” could be created as a slogan, and a marketplace of Diverse Preferential People suddenly appear on the Statute Books to become consumers for Their Struggle. To create not one Hitler, but many Hitlers who feel injustice is done to their People. You join your group, and embark on Class Envy. National Socialists guided under the umbrella of International Socialism.
Germany in 1935, was the mistake. White German National Socialism was too strong and too isolated. It would be the same if Homosexuality or a single religion got too big and too isolated. Lesson learned and waves of immigration forced Diversity onto the population to remove it from happening again. Little Nations run by The State, would become the creed. When small enough, like Islam, Fascism will come a baby to be fed and to counteract the rising Bolsheviks of True Socialism, with one group set upon by the other Perpetual war will rule the people and turn them to rely on the government for safety.
Flattery of the preferred gender (non-male), preferred race (non-white), preferred sexuality (not heterosexual), preferred religion (non-Christianity). Interest in their History Months. And then they’ll vote for you, for their team.
So a ‘luxury item’ like chocolates, or White Faces, pretending at being exclusively for ‘the rich’ could attract those wanting an increased status by envy. The stupidity of smoking, with stained fingers and teeth, hardened arteries and dull skin, and poorer breath; completely bypassed by those women gaining a perceived increase of social status.
Someone took Dale Carnegie‘s proven methods to the letter.
“Zoroastrian tradition envisions three future saviours, one for the end of each 1,000-year period that comprise the last 3,000 years of the world. All three will be born of maidens, conceived while their mothers bathed in a lake that miraculously preserved the seed of the prophet Zoroaster himself. The first will be named Hushedar, the second Hushedarmah, and the third will be Saoshyant, who will lead humanity in the final battle against falsehood.
Eventually, Ahura Mazda will triumph, and his agent Saoshyant will resurrect the dead, whose bodies will be restored to eternal perfection, and whose souls will be cleansed and reunited with God. Time will then end, and truth/righteousness (asha) and immortality will thereafter be everlasting.”
“About 1400 BCE a forty year-old hermit from northeast Iran, named Zoroaster, came down from his mountain to preach a new religion. Zoroaster had been visited by the god Ahura-Mazda who proclaimed that he was the only god in the universe. Unlike most gods, Ahura Mazda was all good, all knowing and all powerful as well as being invisible. In fact, he was so perfect that he needed mediators like angels between himself and the world. Ahura-Mazda struggled against “The Lie” which was not just words but actions represented by Ahriman and his devils. Zoroaster taught that when people died they crossed the Shivat bridge, a sifting bridge in which the bad people fell off into hell and where the good people crossed to find a golden maiden who lead them into the light of heaven where their primary purpose was singing. In contrast the Jews believed in Sheol, a pit beneath the earth where people went when they died. The major myth of the Zoroastrians was that a virgin would bear the Saoshant, a man who would save the world. “
Everybody is from “Chosen People” … in the myriad of superficial differences, we are all the same sheep.
Christine Leigh Heyrman Department of History, University of Delaware ©National Humanities Center
Teaching about Native American religion is a challenging task to tackle with students at any level, if only because the Indian systems of belief and ritual were as legion as the tribes inhabiting North America. So let’s begin by trimming down that bewildering variety to manageable proportions with three glittering generalizations (which might, with luck, prove more useful than misleading).
First, at the time of European contact, all but the simplest indigenous cultures in North America had developed coherent religious systems that included cosmologies—creation myths, transmitted orally from one generation to the next, which purported to explain how those societies had come into being. Second, most native peoples worshiped an all-powerful, all-knowing Creator or “Master Spirit” (a being that assumed a variety of forms and both genders). They also venerated or placated a host of lesser supernatural entities, including an evil god who dealt out disaster, suffering, and death. Third and finally, the members of most tribes believed in the immortality of the human soul and an afterlife, the main feature of which was the abundance of every good thing that made earthly life secure and pleasant.
Detail from Joseph-François Lafitau, Moeurs des sauvages amériquains comparées aux moeurs des premiers temps (Customs of the American Indians compared with the customs of primitive times [in Europe]), 1724. The Library Company of Philadelphia Like all other cultures, the Indian societies of North America hoped to enlist the aid of the supernatural in controlling the natural and social world, and each tribe had its own set of religious observances devoted to that aim. Individuals tried to woo or appease powerful spiritual entities with private prayers or sacrifices of valuable items (e.g., furs, tobacco, food), but when entire communities sought divine assistance to ensure a successful hunt, a good harvest, or victory in warfare, they called upon shamans, priests, and, in fewer tribes, priestesses, whom they believed to have acquired supernatural powers through visions. These uncommon abilities included predicting the future and influencing the weather—matters of vital interest to whole tribes—but shamans might also assist individuals by interpreting dreams and curing or causing outbreaks of witchcraft.
As even this brief account indicates, many key Indian religious beliefs and practices bore broad but striking resemblances to those current among early modern Europeans, both Catholic and Protestant. These cultures, too, credited a creation myth (as set forth in Genesis), venerated a Creator God, dreaded a malicious subordinate deity (Lucifer), and looked forward to the individual soul’s immortality in an afterlife superior in every respect to the here and now. They, too, propitiated their deity with prayers and offerings and relied upon a specially trained clergy to sustain their societies during periods of crisis. Finally, the great majority of early modern Europeans feared witches and pondered the meaning of their dreams.
Important as it is to appreciate the affinities between the religious cultures of Indians and early modern Europeans (and Euro-Americans), there were real differences that must be kept in mind. The most important is that Indians did not distinguish between the natural and the supernatural. On the contrary, Native Americans perceived the “material” and “spiritual” as a unified realm of being—a kind of extended kinship network. In their view, plants, animals and humans partook of divinity through their close connection with “guardian spirits,” a myriad of “supernatural” entities who imbued their “natural” kin with life and power. By contrast, Protestant and Catholic traditions were more inclined to emphasize the gulf that separated the pure, spiritual beings in heaven—God, the angels, and saints—from sinful men and women mired in a profane world filled with temptation and evil.
“Being one of the oldest religions and the oldest monotheist faiths, it had great influences on Christianity, Mithraism, Buddhism, Islam and Judaism and so on. So long is the history of the religion that its doctrinaire changes over time were vastly prodigious. This paper will only focus on the Zoroastrianism and its beliefs during its very earliest existence, starting from the time of Zoroaster (approx. 628-551BC) to the Muslim conquest of the Persian Empire (AD 652) that actually put an end to Zoroastrianism”
“The importance of the Gathas to Zoroastrianism cannot be emphasized enough. They are the centerpiece of scripture and inspiration, like the Tao Te Ching is to Taoism.”
“When you think you have learned enough of the Avestan language, do not start by translating the Gathas first. They are the guide. One wrong interpretation would be enough to mislead the people on that point. Engage yourself with other parts of the Avesta. Wait for five years, master the language, and then embark on translating the Gathas. “I made a promise, a promise that made me turn to the desired translation full thirty-five years later.
10th World Zoroastrian Congress 27th – 30th December 2013 in Mumbai sponsored by Dr. Cyrus S. Poonawalla, chairman Serum Institute of India Ltd.
“There are compelling reasons for referring to the background, school, and interest of a translator. Let me give an example by way of explanation. When I was 14 or 15 years of age, I read an Urdu book authored by the son of the famous Indian Muslim reformer, Sir Syed Ahmad Khan. He quoted an anecdote about an oriented British official in India who was supposed to have a good command of both the “vernacular” and Indian lore. The official often heard his servants reciting poetic couplets in their conversation with each other. One day he asked them to teach him a couplet. One of them presented him with one. It runs:
Ham huay, tum huay, keh mîr huay
The verbatim translation is:”Be it we, be it you, be it Mir; in her locks, all became prisoners. “The official memorized it. After a week or so, the servants asked him about the couplet. He came out in good Urdu:”Hum tum aur Khânsâmân Amîr ke hâth bâl ki rassi se bândh kar jel-khâne men dâl detâ hai. “It means: “I take you and our cook Amir, tie your hands with hair ropes and throw you in prison. “Evidently he had forgotten the couplet and interpreted it as he had understood it. He left the servants stunned!
To comprehend the couplet, one has to know that in Persian, Urdu and allied languages, the heart of the lover gets entangled in the curly hair of the beloved. This means falling in love. Mir, the proper name used in the poem, is the name of the poet who composed it and not a third person, certainly not the cook who worked for the British official and whose name happened to be Amir, not Mir. The couplet is not in the usual prose syntax. This makes the word-to-word rendering depart further from its own syntax. The words “we and you” denote “all” but the poet. A deeper study would require one to know the poet and his age to determine to whom the “zulf,” or the curls, belong and who the beloved is; a girl, a boy, God, or the Prophet. One should read not only the poem that contains the couplet but the entire collection, the divân. Above all, one should have a fair knowledge of the relevant culture. Then what appear as inconsistencies in a poem with each couplet seemingly saying something new, would appear consistent, relevant and revealing a profound message. And now let us render the couplet into English so that we comprehend and enjoy it. It reads: “She is so beautiful that all, including Poet Mir, who see her, fall in love with her. ““